The highlight of today's report is this story--potentially what Obama will use to hit McCain with next.
The Obama Strategy: preempt whatever is coming with William Ayers, etc. with ties connecting McCain to Keating.
Downfalls to this: this story happened a long time ago, there is no new information.
The benefits: Obama has control of the race right now--the wind is at his back. He can control the message, so he should. McCain has low poll numbers--so capitalize on that and make them lower. That's what Paul Begala said on Meet the Press this morning, that it isn't good enough for the Democratic Party just to have a rapid response, we have to have rapid attack. Even if Obama succeeds in getting McCain tied to this story for five, seven, or ten days--that’s five, seven or ten days closer to the election. Also, timing wise, it brings us up to the Troopergate Decision in Alaska--could that have the potential to be an October distraction of a week or more? Keep that on your radar screen.
And a note about the rumors that we have heard all weekend, beginning late last week, about this forthcoming, upcoming, to be determined, big new strategy from John McCain to hit Obama and tie him with his past associations. I've even heard about it from some people who I would describe as mild followers of the race, they've called it "McCain's new strategy." The campaign hasn't started it yet. They haven't launched an ad. They really haven't gone on the attack (at least from their running mate--who is down tomorrow in Sedona with debate prep--and they've only sent Sarah Palin on the attack--to California (not going to get many votes there) and Nebraska which we discussed. Is it possible that the McCain strategy is to start a negative campaign without actually doing anything, or spending any money? They succeeded in getting questions about Obama's past associations raised on all of the Sunday shows today. On the flip side, they also succeeded in getting questions raised about the merits of this "new strategy," which earned the ire of some Republicans such as Mike Murphy also on Meet. But, if this is indeed their strategy, then it is very shrewd and very smart. Of course, it could all be part of the planned rollout to Tuesday's debate in Nashville. But even that doesn't make too much sense because it is a town hall meeting, and being involved in engaging conversations in front of a live audience of voters is not usually the most conducive place to start a final, vicious, frontal attack on your opponent, especially since at least 33% of the audience at Belmont will be self-described (maybe even registered?) Independents.